Match statistics snapshot
- Pisa created the clearer chances on xG (0.06 vs 0.82, Δ 0.76).
- Pisa fired more attempts (11 vs 3 shots).
- Pisa was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Verona | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 0.06 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.82Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Verona | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 358Lead | Accurate passes | 195 |
| 464Lead | Total passes | 294 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Verona | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Verona | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| 0.00 | Goals prevented | 0.00 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Verona | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |