Match statistics snapshot
- 1.
- FC Heidenheim created the clearer chances on xG (1.31 vs 1.36, Δ 0.05).
- 1.
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vfl Wolfsburg | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 1.31 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.36Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots off target |
| 6 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vfl Wolfsburg | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 472Lead | Accurate passes | 264 |
| 576Lead | Total passes | 361 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vfl Wolfsburg | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vfl Wolfsburg | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.30 | Goals prevented | 0.30 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vfl Wolfsburg | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |