Match statistics snapshot
- Viborg created the clearer chances on xG (2.54 vs 2.20, Δ 0.34).
- Viborg was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
- Viborg held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viborg | Statistic | Aarhus |
|---|---|---|
| 2.54Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.20 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viborg | Statistic | Aarhus |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 400Lead | Accurate passes | 359 |
| 481Lead | Total passes | 434 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viborg | Statistic | Aarhus |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viborg | Statistic | Aarhus |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viborg | Statistic | Aarhus |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |