Match statistics snapshot
- Viborg fired more attempts (15 vs 6 shots).
- Brondby was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 20%).
- Viborg held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viborg | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viborg | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 389Lead | Accurate passes | 282 |
| 495Lead | Total passes | 381 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viborg | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viborg | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viborg | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |