Match statistics snapshot
- Brondby created the clearer chances on xG (0.86 vs 1.08, Δ 0.22).
- Viborg fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Brondby was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viborg | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 0.86 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.08Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viborg | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 437 | Accurate passes | 454Lead |
| 497 | Total passes | 521Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viborg | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viborg | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viborg | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |