Match statistics snapshot
- Brondby created the clearer chances on xG (1.46 vs 3.02, Δ 1.56).
- Brondby fired more attempts (26 vs 8 shots).
- Viborg was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viborg | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 1.46 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.02Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 18Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 11Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 26Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viborg | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 300 | Accurate passes | 602Lead |
| 366 | Total passes | 667Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viborg | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viborg | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viborg | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |