Match statistics snapshot
- FC Copenhagen created the clearer chances on xG (2.08 vs 3.76, Δ 1.68).
- FC Copenhagen fired more attempts (21 vs 10 shots).
- Viborg was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viborg | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 2.08 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.76Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 18Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viborg | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 87% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 409 | Accurate passes | 490Lead |
| 471 | Total passes | 551Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viborg | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viborg | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viborg | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |