Match statistics snapshot
- FC Nordsjaelland fired more attempts (10 vs 7 shots).
- Viborg was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 30%).
- FC Nordsjaelland held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viborg | Statistic | Fc Nordsjaelland |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viborg | Statistic | Fc Nordsjaelland |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 313 | Accurate passes | 447Lead |
| 402 | Total passes | 550Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viborg | Statistic | Fc Nordsjaelland |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viborg | Statistic | Fc Nordsjaelland |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viborg | Statistic | Fc Nordsjaelland |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |