Match statistics snapshot
- FC Nordsjaelland created the clearer chances on xG (0.67 vs 1.23, Δ 0.56).
- FC Nordsjaelland fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Viborg was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viborg | Statistic | Fc Nordsjaelland |
|---|---|---|
| 0.67 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.23Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viborg | Statistic | Fc Nordsjaelland |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 294 | Accurate passes | 530Lead |
| 372 | Total passes | 619Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viborg | Statistic | Fc Nordsjaelland |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viborg | Statistic | Fc Nordsjaelland |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viborg | Statistic | Fc Nordsjaelland |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.