Match statistics snapshot
- FC Nordsjaelland created the clearer chances on xG (1.49 vs 2.80, Δ 1.31).
- FC Nordsjaelland fired more attempts (22 vs 13 shots).
- Viborg was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viborg | Statistic | Fc Nordsjaelland |
|---|---|---|
| 1.49 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.80Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viborg | Statistic | Fc Nordsjaelland |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 91%Lead |
| 343 | Accurate passes | 655Lead |
| 411 | Total passes | 716Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viborg | Statistic | Fc Nordsjaelland |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viborg | Statistic | Fc Nordsjaelland |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viborg | Statistic | Fc Nordsjaelland |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |