Match statistics snapshot
- Viborg fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Lyngby was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 38%).
- Viborg held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viborg | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viborg | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 398Lead | Accurate passes | 256 |
| 486Lead | Total passes | 343 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viborg | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viborg | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viborg | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.