Match statistics snapshot
- Viborg created the clearer chances on xG (1.64 vs 1.43, Δ 0.21).
- Lyngby fired more attempts (22 vs 14 shots).
- Viborg was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viborg | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 1.64Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.43 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11 | Shots inside the box | 18Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 13Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viborg | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 267 | Accurate passes | 441Lead |
| 336 | Total passes | 517Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viborg | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viborg | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viborg | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.