Match statistics snapshot
- Viborg created the clearer chances on xG (1.54 vs 0.91, Δ 0.63).
- Viborg fired more attempts (14 vs 6 shots).
- Lyngby was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 7%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viborg | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 1.54Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.91 |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viborg | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 529Lead | Accurate passes | 326 |
| 599Lead | Total passes | 407 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viborg | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viborg | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| Goalkeeper saves | ||
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viborg | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.