Match statistics snapshot
- Randers FC created the clearer chances on xG (0.43 vs 1.99, Δ 1.56).
- Randers FC fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Randers FC was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viborg | Statistic | Randers Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.43 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.99Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viborg | Statistic | Randers Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 361 | Accurate passes | 394Lead |
| 425 | Total passes | 470Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viborg | Statistic | Randers Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 13Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viborg | Statistic | Randers Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viborg | Statistic | Randers Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.