Match statistics snapshot
- Randers FC created the clearer chances on xG (0.72 vs 1.13, Δ 0.41).
- Randers FC fired more attempts (8 vs 6 shots).
- Viborg was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viborg | Statistic | Randers Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.72 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.13Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 8Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viborg | Statistic | Randers Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 375 | Accurate passes | 509Lead |
| 449 | Total passes | 587Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viborg | Statistic | Randers Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viborg | Statistic | Randers Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viborg | Statistic | Randers Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |