Match statistics snapshot
- Viborg created the clearer chances on xG (2.07 vs 1.18, Δ 0.89).
- Sonderjyske fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Viborg was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viborg | Statistic | Sonderjyske |
|---|---|---|
| 2.07Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.18 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viborg | Statistic | Sonderjyske |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 273 | Accurate passes | 525Lead |
| 345 | Total passes | 601Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viborg | Statistic | Sonderjyske |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viborg | Statistic | Sonderjyske |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viborg | Statistic | Sonderjyske |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |