Match statistics snapshot
- Viborg created the clearer chances on xG (1.55 vs 1.34, Δ 0.21).
- Sonderjyske fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Viborg was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viborg | Statistic | Sonderjyske |
|---|---|---|
| 1.55Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.34 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viborg | Statistic | Sonderjyske |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 395Lead | Accurate passes | 274 |
| 463Lead | Total passes | 336 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viborg | Statistic | Sonderjyske |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viborg | Statistic | Sonderjyske |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viborg | Statistic | Sonderjyske |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.