Match statistics snapshot
- Sonderjyske created the clearer chances on xG (1.35 vs 1.40, Δ 0.05).
- Viborg fired more attempts (18 vs 5 shots).
- Sonderjyske was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viborg | Statistic | Sonderjyske |
|---|---|---|
| 1.35 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.40Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viborg | Statistic | Sonderjyske |
|---|---|---|
| 68%Lead | Ball possession | 32% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 541Lead | Accurate passes | 224 |
| 628Lead | Total passes | 302 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viborg | Statistic | Sonderjyske |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viborg | Statistic | Sonderjyske |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.26 | Goals prevented | 0.26 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viborg | Statistic | Sonderjyske |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.