Match statistics snapshot
- Viking created the clearer chances on xG (2.42 vs 0.87, Δ 1.55).
- Viking fired more attempts (22 vs 9 shots).
- Aalesund was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viking | Statistic | Aalesund |
|---|---|---|
| 2.42Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.87 |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viking | Statistic | Aalesund |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 343Lead | Accurate passes | 286 |
| 439Lead | Total passes | 372 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viking | Statistic | Aalesund |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viking | Statistic | Aalesund |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.66 | Goals prevented | 0.66 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viking | Statistic | Aalesund |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |