Match statistics snapshot
- Both sides matched on xG (2.56 each).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viking | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 2.56 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.56 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viking | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 223 | Accurate passes | 463Lead |
| 286 | Total passes | 542Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viking | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viking | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viking | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.