Match statistics snapshot
- Viking created the clearer chances on xG (1.38 vs 1.20, Δ 0.18).
- Viking fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Viking was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viking | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 1.38Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.20 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viking | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 68%Lead | Ball possession | 32% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 63% |
| 475Lead | Accurate passes | 172 |
| 580Lead | Total passes | 271 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viking | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viking | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viking | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |