Match statistics snapshot
- Viking created the clearer chances on xG (1.21 vs 1.07, Δ 0.14).
- Viking fired more attempts (18 vs 13 shots).
- Viking was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viking | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 1.21Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.07 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viking | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 604Lead | Accurate passes | 204 |
| 695Lead | Total passes | 298 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viking | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viking | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viking | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |