Match statistics snapshot
- Viking created the clearer chances on xG (1.78 vs 1.50, Δ 0.28).
- Viking fired more attempts (19 vs 12 shots).
- Viking held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viking | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 1.78Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.50 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viking | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 348Lead | Accurate passes | 290 |
| 432Lead | Total passes | 388 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viking | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viking | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 6 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viking | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |