Match statistics snapshot
- Viking created the clearer chances on xG (1.31 vs 0.93, Δ 0.38).
- Viking fired more attempts (14 vs 5 shots).
- Viking held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viking | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.31Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.93 |
| Offsides | ||
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viking | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 387Lead | Accurate passes | 290 |
| 491Lead | Total passes | 394 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viking | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viking | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viking | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |
Statistics is not available yet.