Match statistics snapshot
- Viking created the clearer chances on xG (1.74 vs 0.74, Δ 1.00).
- Viking fired more attempts (17 vs 6 shots).
- KFUM Oslo was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 12%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viking | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.74Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.74 |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viking | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 393Lead | Accurate passes | 268 |
| 484Lead | Total passes | 357 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viking | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viking | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viking | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |