Match statistics snapshot
- Viking fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Rosenborg was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 40%).
- Viking held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viking | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viking | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 458Lead | Accurate passes | 304 |
| 527Lead | Total passes | 363 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viking | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viking | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viking | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |