Match statistics snapshot
- Viking created the clearer chances on xG (2.18 vs 0.66, Δ 1.52).
- Rosenborg fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Viking was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viking | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 2.18Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.66 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viking | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 295 | Accurate passes | 359Lead |
| 366 | Total passes | 430Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viking | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viking | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viking | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 17Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.