Match statistics snapshot
- Viking created the clearer chances on xG (2.34 vs 0.90, Δ 1.44).
- Viking fired more attempts (18 vs 10 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viking | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 2.34Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.90 |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 10Lead |
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viking | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 320 | Accurate passes | 355Lead |
| 399 | Total passes | 452Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viking | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viking | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -1.49 | Goals prevented | -1.49 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viking | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |