Match statistics snapshot
- Viking created the clearer chances on xG (2.80 vs 0.45, Δ 2.35).
- Viking fired more attempts (22 vs 8 shots).
- Tromso was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Viking | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 2.80Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.45 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Viking | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 465Lead | Accurate passes | 255 |
| 547Lead | Total passes | 345 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Viking | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Viking | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Viking | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |