Match statistics snapshot
- Vikingur Reykjavik created the clearer chances on xG (2.71 vs 1.29, Δ 1.42).
- Cercle Brugge fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Vikingur Reykjavik was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vikingur Reykjavik | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 2.71Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.29 |
| Offsides | ||
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vikingur Reykjavik | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 73%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 313Lead | Accurate passes | 244 |
| 431Lead | Total passes | 369 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vikingur Reykjavik | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vikingur Reykjavik | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.25 | Goals prevented | -0.25 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vikingur Reykjavik | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |