Match statistics snapshot
- Vikingur Reykjavik created the clearer chances on xG (1.04 vs 0.96, Δ 0.08).
- Djurgardens IF fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Djurgardens IF was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 9%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vikingur Reykjavik | Statistic | Djurgardens If |
|---|---|---|
| 1.04Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.96 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vikingur Reykjavik | Statistic | Djurgardens If |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 402Lead | Accurate passes | 238 |
| 481Lead | Total passes | 313 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vikingur Reykjavik | Statistic | Djurgardens If |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vikingur Reykjavik | Statistic | Djurgardens If |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -0.86 | Goals prevented | -0.86 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vikingur Reykjavik | Statistic | Djurgardens If |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.