Match statistics snapshot
- Vila Nova created the clearer chances on xG (1.42 vs 0.73, Δ 0.69).
- Vila Nova fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- Vila Nova held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vila Nova | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 1.42Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.73 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vila Nova | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 345Lead | Accurate passes | 219 |
| 405Lead | Total passes | 287 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vila Nova | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vila Nova | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vila Nova | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |