Match statistics snapshot
- Vila Nova created the clearer chances on xG (1.29 vs 0.09, Δ 1.20).
- Vila Nova fired more attempts (20 vs 2 shots).
- Remo was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vila Nova | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.29Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.09 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vila Nova | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 288Lead | Accurate passes | 208 |
| 360Lead | Total passes | 278 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vila Nova | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vila Nova | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vila Nova | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.