Match statistics snapshot
- Virtus Entella created the clearer chances on xG (2.26 vs 0.53, Δ 1.73).
- Virtus Entella fired more attempts (14 vs 8 shots).
- Virtus Entella was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Virtus Entella | Statistic | Padova |
|---|---|---|
| 2.26Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.53 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Virtus Entella | Statistic | Padova |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 339Lead | Accurate passes | 214 |
| 430Lead | Total passes | 302 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Virtus Entella | Statistic | Padova |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Virtus Entella | Statistic | Padova |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Virtus Entella | Statistic | Padova |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |