Vision 3-2 Medeama Prediction

VisionVision
3 — 2FT
MedeamaMedeama
OverviewLineupsStatisticsStandingsEventsPlayersPredictionsFormInjuriesH2H

Updated

VisionVisionvsMedeamaMedeama

Match DNA · Predictions ↗

Defensive grind — too close to call

Estimated win chances: Vision 32.7%, draw 32.4%, Medeama 34.9%. From 12 and 12 competition matches.

Low tempo / cagey
TempoMedium
VolatilityLow
Expected goalsLow
Tactical styleDefensive grind
Upset potentialMedium
Draw riskHigh
Model confidenceLow

Outcome model

Sportra's estimate from each team's season goal rates. It is a statistical guide, not betting advice.

Goal expectancy

0.90Expected goals0.94

From 12 and 12 competition matches

Likely scorelines (Poisson)

  • 0–016%
  • 0–115%
  • 1–014.4%
  • 1–113.5%
  • 0–27.1%

Form & momentum

Weighted momentum, recent result run, and form-window W–D–L — the live pulse before kickoff.

22Cold spellVision
Weighted momentum

Medeama arrives with stronger form weighting (+33 momentum).

55BuildingMedeama
Vision · Structured / conservativeMedeama · Structured / conservative

Vision

2W · 5D · 5L
Recent →LLLDLDDWLDWD
Momentum index

Medeama

6W · 3D · 3L
Recent →WWLLDWLDDWWW
Momentum index

Form split comparison

Wins, draws, and losses across the sampled form window

Season record

League totals anchoring the snapshot — points, goal balance, and season shape vs opponent.

Table gapMedeama +10

Vision

11 pts
17% wins

2W · 5D · 5L · 12 played

For
6
Against
11
Goal diff -5

Medeama

21 pts
50% wins

6W · 3D · 3L · 12 played

For
11
Against
8
Goal diff +3

Season shape comparison

League table W–D–L, goal balance, and form-run counts from league profile signals

League depth signals

Extremes, discipline windows, and split stats from the full league profile.

Matchup edges

Attack vs opponent defense in the matchup comparison.

  • Vision offensive edge

    Vision faces a stingier defense than their attack rating suggests.

    -58
  • Medeama offensive edge

    Medeama's attack (100%) vs Vision's defense (42%).

    +58

Team comparison

Comparison indices from the match data partner.

Attack rating

Attacking threat in the final third.

Vision0
Medeama100

Defense rating

How well each side limits chances.

Vision42
Medeama58

Momentum

Weighted form score (recent results count more).

Vision22
Medeama55

Matchup edge

Attack vs opponent defense (positive = favourable matchup).

Vision-66
Medeama166

Volatility

Higher = more swingy results (big losses, goals against).

Vision30
Medeama30

Form index

Head-to-head form comparison from the model.

Vision13
Medeama88

H2H pull

Historical dominance in recent meetings.

Vision0
Medeama0
VisionStructured / conservative
MedeamaStructured / conservative