Match statistics snapshot
- Vissel Kobe created the clearer chances on xG (1.15 vs 0.81, Δ 0.34).
- Vissel Kobe fired more attempts (15 vs 5 shots).
- FC Tokyo was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.15Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.81 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 53% |
| 375Lead | Accurate passes | 114 |
| 490Lead | Total passes | 217 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.