Match statistics snapshot
- Nagoya Grampus created the clearer chances on xG (0.88 vs 1.10, Δ 0.22).
- Vissel Kobe fired more attempts (14 vs 8 shots).
- Nagoya Grampus was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 0.88 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.10Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 70%Lead | Pass accuracy | 59% |
| 253Lead | Accurate passes | 166 |
| 362Lead | Total passes | 281 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.