Match statistics snapshot
- Vitesse created the clearer chances on xG (1.97 vs 0.98, Δ 0.99).
- Vitesse fired more attempts (22 vs 7 shots).
- Almere City FC was more accurate in front of goal (71% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vitesse | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.97Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.98 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vitesse | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 429Lead | Accurate passes | 305 |
| 528Lead | Total passes | 389 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vitesse | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vitesse | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vitesse | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |