Match statistics snapshot
- Vitesse created the clearer chances on xG (1.05 vs 0.80, Δ 0.25).
- Vitesse fired more attempts (14 vs 7 shots).
- Almere City FC was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vitesse | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.05Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.80 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vitesse | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 243Lead | Accurate passes | 172 |
| 294Lead | Total passes | 215 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vitesse | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vitesse | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.59 | Goals prevented | 0.59 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vitesse | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |