Match statistics snapshot
- Heerenveen created the clearer chances on xG (0.53 vs 2.30, Δ 1.77).
- Heerenveen fired more attempts (19 vs 9 shots).
- Vitesse was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 37%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vitesse | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 0.53 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.30Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vitesse | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 255 | Accurate passes | 433Lead |
| 360 | Total passes | 522Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vitesse | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vitesse | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vitesse | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 3Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.