Match statistics snapshot
- Vitoria created the clearer chances on xG (2.12 vs 0.52, Δ 1.60).
- Ceara fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Vitoria was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vitoria | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 2.12Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.52 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vitoria | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 219 | Accurate passes | 409Lead |
| 277 | Total passes | 479Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vitoria | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vitoria | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.09 | Goals prevented | 0.09 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vitoria | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |