Match statistics snapshot
- Vitoria created the clearer chances on xG (1.22 vs 0.70, Δ 0.52).
- Vitoria fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
- Fluminense was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vitoria | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 1.22Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.70 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vitoria | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 304 | Accurate passes | 374Lead |
| 360 | Total passes | 441Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vitoria | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vitoria | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.63 | Goals prevented | 0.63 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vitoria | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |