Match statistics snapshot
- Vitoria created the clearer chances on xG (2.70 vs 0.79, Δ 1.91).
- Vitoria fired more attempts (20 vs 13 shots).
- Vitoria was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vitoria | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 2.70Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.79 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vitoria | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 241 | Accurate passes | 345Lead |
| 311 | Total passes | 410Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vitoria | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vitoria | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.19 | Goals prevented | 0.19 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vitoria | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |