Match statistics snapshot
- Vasco DA Gama created the clearer chances on xG (0.52 vs 0.77, Δ 0.25).
- Vitoria fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- Vitoria was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vitoria | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 0.52 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.77Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vitoria | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 298 | Accurate passes | 326Lead |
| 385 | Total passes | 394Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vitoria | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vitoria | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.72 | Goals prevented | 0.72 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vitoria | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |