Match statistics snapshot
- Vittsjö created the clearer chances on xG (1.86 vs 1.66, Δ 0.20).
- Vittsjö fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- Vittsjö was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vittsjö | Statistic | Aik |
|---|---|---|
| 1.86Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.66 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vittsjö | Statistic | Aik |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 64%Lead | Pass accuracy | 62% |
| 209Lead | Accurate passes | 175 |
| 329Lead | Total passes | 284 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vittsjö | Statistic | Aik |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vittsjö | Statistic | Aik |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vittsjö | Statistic | Aik |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |