Match statistics snapshot
- Vittsjö created the clearer chances on xG (1.08 vs 0.99, Δ 0.09).
- Vittsjö was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 20%).
- Brommapojkarna W held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vittsjö | Statistic | Brommapojkarna W |
|---|---|---|
| 1.08Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.99 |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vittsjö | Statistic | Brommapojkarna W |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 60% | Pass accuracy | 68%Lead |
| 174 | Accurate passes | 256Lead |
| 292 | Total passes | 375Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vittsjö | Statistic | Brommapojkarna W |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 13Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vittsjö | Statistic | Brommapojkarna W |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vittsjö | Statistic | Brommapojkarna W |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.