Match statistics snapshot
- Häcken W created the clearer chances on xG (0.52 vs 3.78, Δ 3.26).
- Häcken W fired more attempts (30 vs 7 shots).
- Vittsjö was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 37%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vittsjö | Statistic | Häcken W |
|---|---|---|
| 0.52 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.78Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 21Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 13Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 11Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 30Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vittsjö | Statistic | Häcken W |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 276 | Accurate passes | 422Lead |
| 354 | Total passes | 510Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vittsjö | Statistic | Häcken W |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vittsjö | Statistic | Häcken W |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 9Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vittsjö | Statistic | Häcken W |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |