Match statistics snapshot
- Malmö FF W created the clearer chances on xG (1.30 vs 1.87, Δ 0.57).
- Malmö FF W fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Vittsjö was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vittsjö | Statistic | Malmö Ff W |
|---|---|---|
| 1.30 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.87Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vittsjö | Statistic | Malmö Ff W |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 234 | Accurate passes | 404Lead |
| 338 | Total passes | 492Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vittsjö | Statistic | Malmö Ff W |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vittsjö | Statistic | Malmö Ff W |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vittsjö | Statistic | Malmö Ff W |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |