Match statistics snapshot
- FC Porto created the clearer chances on xG (0.77 vs 1.59, Δ 0.82).
- FC Porto fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- FC Porto was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vizela | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 0.77 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.59Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vizela | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 274 | Accurate passes | 419Lead |
| 344 | Total passes | 501Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vizela | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vizela | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vizela | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 17Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.