Match statistics snapshot
- Volos NFC fired more attempts (8 vs 5 shots).
- Lamia was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 38%).
- Volos NFC held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Volos Nfc | Statistic | Lamia |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
| 3 |
| 3 |
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 8Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Volos Nfc | Statistic | Lamia |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Volos Nfc | Statistic | Lamia |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Volos Nfc | Statistic | Lamia |
|---|---|---|
| Blocked shots | ||
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Volos Nfc | Statistic | Lamia |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.